West Side residents packed City Hall to protest Wynn Resorts’ proposed Hudson Yards West casino project, expressing concerns over neighborhood impact and community character.
Key Takeaways:
- West Side residents strongly oppose the Hudson Yards West casino project
- The development plan includes 4,000 residential units and a 5.6-acre park
- Local concerns include overshadowing, altered neighborhood character, and casino presence
Community Pushback Against Hudson Yards West
This week, West Side residents gathered at City Hall to voice their opposition to the controversial Hudson Yards West project. The proposed development, a joint venture between Wynn Resorts and Related Companies, recently received approval from the City Planning Commission (CPC).
The project, which has evolved significantly since its 2009 inception, now includes 4,000 new residential units and a 5.6-acre park. Developers argue that these updates are necessary due to changing financial realities and claim the revised project would bring substantial economic benefits.
However, local residents paint a different picture. Many express concern that the sheer scale of the development would overshadow the neighborhood, potentially blocking sunlight from reaching the High Line and planned green spaces.
Casino Concerns Take Center Stage
The inclusion of a casino in the project has sparked particular outrage among longtime locals. Residents argue that a gambling venue is incompatible with the family-oriented nature of the area. This sentiment echoes concerns previously voiced by [small business owners](https://www.gamblingnews.com/news/small-businesses-speak-out-against-wynn-hudson-yards-casino/), who worry about the potential impact on their livelihoods and the overall character of Manhattan’s West Side.
Developers have countered criticism by highlighting the [project’s](https://www.gamblingnews.com/news/wynn-resorts-discloses-further-details-on-12bn-casino-plan/) potential broader economic impact, framing it as a crucial investment in public infrastructure and citywide recovery. However, many community members argue that the social and environmental costs would likely outweigh any promised benefits.
The Path Forward
The proposal still faces several hurdles before becoming a reality. In addition to seeking support from the City Council, the project requires a state-issued gaming license for the casino to open. If the plan passes the final stage of the City’s Uniform Land Use Review Procedure, it will seek approval from the City Council, potentially within 60 days.
Should final approval be granted, the proposed casino development will be reviewed as one of the bidders for a gaming license. Three coveted licenses are set to be awarded by the end of the year, with Albany lawmakers ultimately deciding which proposals move forward.
For opponents, the fight won’t end even if the casino is removed from the plan. As the debate continues, one thing remains clear: West Side residents are determined to have their voices heard in shaping the future of their community.
